The big problem here is that just like the concepts overlap to give voice to the voiceless, with resentment and revenge. It moves in a direction of regulation that may be correct but contradicting prerogatives granted by the ruling party less than two years ago. It flies the flag break monopolies (which is not correct, because there is no single medium, in any case should be cited oligopolies), but at the same time the wording allows the creation of others. In the more intimate forum opponents share the philosophy embodied in several articles, more about the distrust that the premium has been known spoonerism win.
If the government would have interested a broad consensus that was the opportunity, projects on the subject submitted by opposition lawmakers nuances are not incompatible with most of the articles in the official initiative, but to achieve a synthesis with the banking that will compete for space numerically in Congress is not in K plans, not only did not attempt some understanding, but what could be achieved by preferred seduction get for rape. In the moment of spectacular announcement, the President made a grotesque error, in stating that: “They spent 26 years with no executive power to send the bill to Congress.”, Nothing more inaccurate, since the advent of democracy, every president elected by popular vote, except Nestor Kirchner, various initiatives amounted to parliament on the subject and these have not attracted the necessary agreements and therefore succumbed to the tangle of interests and pressures, is another matter.